MRSA has become a major issue nurses face daily. It was once very rare, but now has become almost commonplace.
The question I have about this disease is what becomes of a nurse who contracts this organism while on the job. Can he or she continue to nurse? Will everyone they treat become infected? I just don’t know the answers to this problem, but I do know that 4% of healthcare workers will contract this organism this year.
Nurses are constantly bombarded with all types of contagious agents. Along with exposure you can add excessive stress and long work hours which both work to lower the resistance of a person. So, with this in mind, it seems like a good question to find answers for, don’t you agree?
One in five long-term elder care patients carried the dangerous germ in their nose, study finds
FRIDAY, April 23 (HealthDay News) — Certain patients are far more likely than others to carry methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), in their noses, a new study shows.
Although they are not infected with the potentially lethal germ, its mere presence heightens their risk of developing MRSA-related pneumonia, bloodstream infection and surgical site infection, the research concludes.
In the United States, about 1 percent of people carry MRSA in their nose. But this study of 2,055 patients found that MRSA was present in the noses of 20 percent of long-term elder care patients, 16 percent of HIV-infected patients, and 14 percent and 15 percent of inpatient and outpatient kidney dialysis patients.
“Hospitals performing active surveillance for MRSA should consider such patient populations for screening cultures,” study author Leonard Mermel, medical director of the department of epidemiology and infection control at Rhode Island Hospital, said in a news release.
USA100 — a health care-associated MRSA strain — was the most common MRSA strain detected in patients, but a more virulent community-associated strain known as USA300 was much more commonly found in HIV-infected patients, the researchers noted. They also detected some MRSA strains not previously identified in the United States, including an MRSA clone common in Brazil.
There were huge differences in the number of MRSA colonies in the noses of the patients in the study. Some had as few as three colonies of MRSA while others had as many as 15 million colonies.
“This finding is important because heavy MRSA colonization of the nose is an independent risk factor for the development of a surgical site infection,” Mermel said.
Further research is needed to learn why people have different strains and quantities of MRSA in their noses, Mermel said.
The study appears online and in the June print issue of the journal Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more about MRSA.
— Robert Preidt
SOURCE: Rhode Island Hospital, news release, April 20, 2010
Last Updated: April 23, 2010
Related articles by Zemanta
- Who is at risk for MRSA? (scienceblog.com)
- Solution to killer superbug found in Norway (ctv.ca)
- How to Protect Yourself from MRSA and other Hospital Infections (chrisabraham.com)